Long-term Outcomes Of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Research Articles

The Feasibility, Safety, and Long-term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Neoplasia in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Evidence regarding the utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is limited. This meta-analysis aims to understand the feasibility, safety, and long-term outcomes of ESD in IBD patients. Electronic databases were searched for observational and case-controlled studies. Primary endpoints were en bloc resection and margin-negative resection of neoplastic lesions. Secondary endpoints included procedure-related bleeding and perforation, local recurrence, and metachronous neoplasia. We analyzed 25 studies with a total of 585 neoplastic lesions in 552 patients. The rates of en bloc resection and margin-negative resection were 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-0.92] and 0.78 (95% CI 0.72-0.83), respectively. Meta-regression analysis showed longer disease duration was significantly associated with the higher rate of en bloc resection. The rates of procedure-related bleeding and perforation were 0.080 (95% CI 0.057-0.11) and 0.055 (95% CI 0.038-0.081), respectively. The rates of local recurrence and metachronous neoplasia were 0.008 events/person-year (95% CI 0.002-0.013) and 0.031 event/person-year (95% CI 0.016-0.046), respectively. Meta-analysis of case-controlled studies found no significant differences in the endpoints between IBD patients treated by ESD and those treated by endoscopic mucosal resection, or non-IBD patients treated by ESD. ESD is a feasible and safe procedure to remove neoplastic lesions in IBD patients. Given there is a considerable risk of metachronous neoplasia development, postoperative surveillance colonoscopy with an appropriate consultation with surgeons is essential to monitor not only local recurrence but also neoplastic changes in the remaining colon.

Effect of renal insufficiency on the short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: Propensity score-matched analysis.

It is unclear whether renal insufficiency (RI) itself is a risk factor for adverse outcomes after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gastric ESD in patients with and without RI using propensity score-matching analysis. In all, 4775 patients with 4775 early gastric cancer lesions undergoing ESD were analyzed. 1:1 propensity score-matching was performed between patients with and without RI using 12 variables. After matching, logistic regression and survival analyses were performed for short- and long-term outcomes of ESD, respectively. The matching yielded 188 pairs of patients with and without RI. In both univariable and multivariable analyses, the presence of RI was not significantly associated with postprocedural bleeding (unadjusted odds ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 0.74-4.42; adjusted odds ratio 1.86, 95% confidence interval 0.74-4.65, respectively). When RI patients were subclassified into patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2 and eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 , no significant differences in bleeding rates were found compared to their matched controls in both groups. Perforation, en bloc resection, en bloc and R0 resection, and curative resection rates of RI patients were 2.1%, 98.4%, 91.0%, and 78.2%, respectively, which were comparable to those of non-RI patients. During a median follow-up of 119 months, there was no difference in gastric cancer-specific survival between patients with and without RI (P = 0.143). The outcomes of ESD were comparable in patients with and without RI. Decreased renal function itself may not be a reason to keep patients with RI from receiving gastric ESD.

The Feasibility and Safety of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Circumferential Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cell Neoplasms.

Background It remains controversial whether endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is still appropriate for circumferential superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms (SESCN), and few studies compared the short-term and long-term outcomes of ESD with radical surgery. Methods A total of 140 patients with SESCN who underwent ESD or surgery between February 2014 and October 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The characteristics of patients, operative time, postoperative complications, overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and quality of life (QOL) were compared between the ESD and surgery groups. The effect of different methods to prevent esophageal stenosis after ESD were analysed. Results Drinking, family history of cancer, macroscopic type, and intrapapillary capillary loop (IPCL) type were independent risk factors for deep submucosal invasion (SM ≥ 200 μm). Smoking and IPCL type were independent predictive factors for angiolymphatic invasion. The average operative time of ESD was significantly shorter than that of surgery (174.5 ± 51.16 min vs. 255.9 ± 88.18 min, p < 0.001). The incidence of perioperative complications in ESD group was significantly lower than that in surgery group (5.5% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.015). The ESD group had significantly better functional scale scores for emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and global health status, and lower rates of pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, diarrhoea, reflux, and trouble with taste than the surgery group. No significant difference in OS and RFS between ESD and surgery group. Conclusions ESD can significantly shorten the operative time and reduce perioperative complications. Additionally, on the premise of using appropriate measures to prevent postoperative stenosis, ESD can be the first choice for the treatment of SESCN, which could provide better QOL, and the long-term prognosis of ESD is no less than that of surgery.

Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer in Patients Aged ≥75 Years.

Simple SummaryThe number of elderly patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) who meet the indications for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasing. Since elderly patients have more comorbidities, and lower life expectancy than younger patients, special considerations to establish treatment strategies according to prognosis is needed. We investigate overall survival and risk factors related to survival after ESD in these patients. During the follow-up, the 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival was 91.2%, 83.5%, and 54.5%, respectively. Smoking, history of cancer of other organs, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio > 1.6, Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3, and presence of lymphovascular invasion were independent five risk factors for poor overall survival. The long-term outcome of ESD was poorer in elderly patients with risk factors than in those without. These prognostic factors can also be useful in deciding whether to recommend additive surgery and a close follow-up after non-curative endoscopic treatment in the elderly patients.Background and Aims: The number of elderly patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) who meet the indications for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasing. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) in elderly patients undergoing ESD for EGC. Methods: Between January 2006 and December 2018, 439 patients aged ≥75 years who underwent ESD for EGC were analyzed. The clinical outcomes and prognosis were evaluated, and independent risk factors for OS were identified. Results: The mean patient (302 men, 137 women) age was 78.3 (range 75–92) years. En bloc, R0, and curative resections were achieved in 96.8%, 90.7%, and 75.6%, respectively, without severe adverse events. During the follow-up (median 54.2 (range 4.0–159.6) months), 86 patients died (three of gastric cancer). The 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS was 91.2%, 83.5%, and 54.5%, respectively, and the 3-, 5-, and 10-year cancer related survival rate were 99.7%, 99.1% and 97.5%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, smoking, history of cancer of other organs, NLR > 1.6, Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3, and presence of lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio = 3.96, 1.78, 1.83, 1.83, and 2.63, respectively, all p < 0.05) were independent five risk factors for poor OS. The high-risk group (≥3 risk factors) showed a significantly lower OS than the low-risk group (<2 risk factors) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The five factors could be useful in predicting the long-term prognosis of elderly ESD patients or deciding the therapeutic approaches in case of non-curative resection.

[Therapeutic effect of endoscopic submucosal dissection on the treatment of early gastric cancer].

Objective: To analyze the long-term therapeutic effect of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) on the treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed EGC patients who underwent ESD at Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS), from January 2009 to December 2016. The incidence rates of local recurrence, synchronous cancer and heterogeneous cancer were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze 5-years recurrence free survival (RFS) and 5-years disease special survival (DSS) of all patients. Results: A total of 255 EGC patients were enrolled in this study, included 175 differentiated early gastric cancer (D-EGC) patients and 80 undifferentiated early gastric cancer (UD-EGC) patients. Among them, 171 patients within the extended indication of ESD while 84 patients beyond the extended indication of ESD. Among the 225 patients, the incidence rates of local recurrence, synchronous cancer and heterogeneous cancer were 2.0%, 2.0% and 2.4%, respectively. The local recurrence rates of D-EGC group and UD-EGC group was 1.7% and 2.5%, respectively, without significant difference (χ(2)=0.176, P=0.675). The incidence rates of synchronous and heterogenous cancer in the D-EGC group were 2.3% and 3.4%, higher than 1.2% and 0 of UD-EGC group, although there was no significant difference (χ(2)=0.306, P=0.580 vs χ(2)=2.809, P=0.094). There were no significant differences in 5-years RFS (91.3% vs 95.9%, P=0.236) and 5-years DSS (100% vs 98.6%, P=0.156) between D-EGC group and UD-EGC group. Conclusions: The long-term outcome of ESD in the treatment of EGS is good. More attention should be paid to the occurrence of local recurrence and heterogeneous cancer in EGC patients undergo ESD. These patients still have a good long-tern outcome even undergoing ESD for more than once.

Long-term follow-up of endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric dysplasia and early neoplasia in a United Kingdom Caucasian population – a tertiary centre experience

Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is extensively performed for the treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC) in the Eastern countries due to its favourable outcomes compared to gastrectomy in terms of lower complication rates, shorter hospital stays, better quality of life, with similar 5-year survival rate. Yet, its use is still limited in the UK.Aim: A long-term follow-up study to evaluate the outcome of ESD in the treatment of EGC in a Caucasian population at a tertiary referral centre in the United Kingdom.Methods: Data for the 35 Caucasian patients, who underwent ESD in a tertiary referral centre between May 2012 and June 2017 were collected. The selected patients were followed-up until May 2018. Curative resection (CR) and survival rates were used to measure the efficacy of ESD.Results: ESD was attempted on 46 lesions and completed on 37. En-bloc and CR rates of 57% and 19% were achieved, respectively. 24% of the lesions were non-CR and 57% were indefinite for non-CR/CR and 41% of the lesions showed change in histological grade post-ESD. Complete reversal of dysplasia/neoplasia was seen in 60% of the ‘indefinite’ group and 100% of the CR group at latest FU (18 months, mean). Recurrence was seen in 23% of the patients at latest FU. Seventy-one months’ survival rate was 77%, while the disease-specific mortality was 0%.Conclusions: This study demonstrates the positive long-term outcome of ESD for gastric neoplasia in a UK Caucasian population, encouraging further development and implementation of ESD in the UK.

Renal Dysfunction is a Risk Factor of Death after Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Elderly Patients Aged ≥80 Years.

Introduction Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) is well accepted. However, its adaptation for elderly patients is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the prognosis and long-term outcomes of ESD for EGC in elderly patients aged ≥80 years by comparing their findings to the findings of patients aged <80 years. Materials and Methods The study included 533 patients (632 lesions). The patients were divided into an elderly group (age, ≥80 years; 108 patients; 128 lesions; mean age, 83.4 ± 2.7 years) and a nonelderly group (age, <80 years; 425 patients; 504 lesions; mean age, 69.6 ± 7.9 years). We compared patient and lesion characteristics, overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) between the 2 groups retrospectively. Multivariate analysis was performed to clarify the risk factors of death after ESD. Results The rate of curative resection and adverse events was not significantly different between the groups. The mean survival time periods with regard to OS/DSS in the elderly and nonelderly groups were 75.8 ± 5.9 and 122.8 ± 2.6 months (P < 0.05)/120.0 ± 3.0 and 136.4 ± 0.6 months (not significant), respectively. In the elderly group, eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 was an independent risk factor of death (hazard ratio = 5.32; 95% confidence interval = 1.39–20.5; P=0.015). Conclusion ESD for EGC can be performed safely and can achieve high curability with good prognosis in elderly patients aged ≥80 years. After ESD, close attention should be paid to elderly patients with severe chronic kidney disease.

Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection with surgical gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: An updated meta-analysis.

BACKGROUNDThere are several surgical options for treating early gastric cancers (EGCs), such as endoscopic resection, laparoscopic or open gastrectomy with D1 or D2 lymphadenectomy. Endoscopic resection for EGC with low risk of lymph node metastasis has been widely accepted as a therapeutic alternative. The role of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in treating EGC is not well established, especially when compared with resection surgery cases in a long-term follow-up scope.AIMTo compare the safety and efficacy of the short- and long-term outcomes between ESD and resection surgery.METHODSWe searched the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from January 1990 to June 2018, enrolling studies reporting short- or long-term outcomes of ESD in comparison with resection surgery for EGC. The quality of the studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Stata software (version 12.0) was used for the analysis. Pooling analysis was conducted using either fixed- or random-effects models depending on heterogeneity across studies.RESULTSFourteen studies comprising 5112 patients were eligible for analysis (2402 for EGC and 2710 for radical surgery). Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the ESD approach showed advantages through decreased operation time [weighted mean difference (WMD): -140.02 min, 95%CI: -254.23 to -34.82 min, P = 0.009], shorter hospital stay (WMD: -5.41 d, 95% CI: -5.93 to -4.89 d, P < 0.001), and lower postoperative complication rate [Odds ratio (OR) = 0.39, 95%CI: 0.28-0.55, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, EGC patients who underwent ESD had higher recurrence rate (OR = 9.24, 95%CI: 5.94-14.36, P < 0.001) than resection surgery patients. However, the long-term survival including overall survival [Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.26-1.00, P = 0.05] and event-free survival (HR = 1.59, 95%CI: 0.66-9.81, P = 0.300) showed no significant differences between these two groups.CONCLUSIONIn the treatment of EGC, ESD was safe and feasible in comparison with resection surgery, with advantages in several surgical and post-operative recovery parameters. Although the recurrence rate was higher in ESD group, the long-term survival was still comparable in these two groups, suggesting ESD could be recommended as standard treatment for EGC with indications.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer: A meta-analysis.

111 Background: It is still controversial to treat undifferentiated early gastric cancer by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Therefore, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis to investigate long-term outcomes of ESD and surgery for undifferentiated early gastric cancer. Methods: PubMed, Cochran Library, and EMBASE were used to search for relevant researches comparing endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for undifferentiated early gastric cancer. The methodological quality of the included publications was evaluated using the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies. The overall survival rate, recurrence rate, adverse event rate, and complete resection rate were explored, and the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated. Results: This meta-analysis enrolled five studies, with 376 and 1148 participants undergoing ESD and surgery, respectively. Overall survival rate did not show significant difference between ESD and surgery group (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.18 – 1.83, P = 0.34). However, ESD was associated with higher recurrence rate (OR 11.57, 95% CI 5.07 – 26.39, P &lt; 0.001) and lower complete resection rate (OR 0.03, 95% CI 0.01 – 0.11, P &lt; 0.001). Adverse event rate was similar between two groups (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.46 – 1.96, P = 0.88). Conclusions: Despite higher recurrence rate and lower complete resection rate, ESD demonstrated similar overall survival rate and adverse event rate in the treatment of undifferentiated early gastric cancer compared to surgery.

Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely accepted for treating superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC). However, long-term outcomes of ESD and esophagectomy for SESCC have not been compared. We compared the clinical outcomes of ESD and esophagectomy in a matched cohort. Patients who underwent ESD and esophagectomy for SESCC were included. We selected SESCCs without obvious submucosal invasion from the surgical database by reviewing endoscopic images. To minimize the effect of selection bias, propensity score matching was performed. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and metachronous RFS were compared between the 2 groups. Adverse event rates were also compared. In a matched cohort of 120 pairs, OS, DSS, and RFS were comparable between the 2 groups. The 5-year OS, DSS, and RFS rates were 93.9% versus 91.2%, 100% versus 97.4%, and 92.8% versus 95.3% for the ESD and esophagectomy groups, respectively. The metachronous RFS was worse in the ESD group than in the esophagectomy group (P= .004). The 5-year metachronous RFS rates were 90.3% versus 100% for the ESD and esophagectomy groups, respectively. The esophagectomy group showed a higher overall adverse event rate than the ESD group (55.5% vs 18.5%, P< .0001). In each subgroup of mucosal and submucosal cancer, OS, DSS, and RFS were also comparable between the 2 groups. ESD provides long-term outcomes comparable with esophagectomy in patients with SESCC without endoscopic evidence of obvious submucosal invasion. ESD should be considered as the first-line treatment for these patients.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for the Treatment of Superficial Epithelial Gastric Neoplasia in a Portuguese Centre

Background: The emergence of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) made possible en bloc resection of neoplastic gastric lesions, regardless of lesion size, with reduced rates of complications and recurrence. This technique has become the preferred method for curative resection, instead of conventional endoscopic mucosal resection and surgery, when distant metastases have negligible risk. In Western countries experience with this technique has evolved quickly, with an increasing number of case series reported in the literature. This study aims to report the short- and long-term outcomes of ESD in gastric epithelial neoplastic lesions by a single operator in a Portuguese centre. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all gastric ESDs in a tertiary specialised unit during a 5-year period, between May 2012 and September 2017, was performed. Results: A total of 114 ESDs of gastric epithelial lesions were performed during this period; 96.5% of them were removed en bloc and 87.6% with R0 resection. A curative treatment was achieved in 83.2% of the cases. Complications occurred in 13.2% of the procedures, including early and delayed bleeding in 12 patients (10.5%) and one perforation (0.9%). With a median follow-up period of 12 months (interquartile range [IQR] = 18), 6 cases of recurrence at the previous ESD site were diagnosed: 4 residual lesions and 2 local recurrences in previous R0 resections. Residual lesions occurred more often in patients with larger lesions (median = 40.0 mm, IQR = 26 vs. median = 20.0 mm, IQR = 15, p = 0.008) and with positive horizontal margins (HMs) after resection (50.0 vs. 0.0%, Fisher exact test, p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of metachronous gastric lesions at 34 months was 16.1%. All new lesions were effectively treated using an endoscopic technique. The disease-specific survival at 12 months was 100%. Conclusion: This study showed that ESD is an effective resection technique for gastric lesions with a good safety profile, confirming other European series. Regardless, high en bloc resection positive HM is still a problem in some specimens resected by ESD. Endoscopic surveillance can detect local recurrence and new lesions during early stages, potentially treatable by endoscopy.

Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.

144 Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been accepted as standard treatment for early gastric cancer. However, comparative outcomes of ESD and surgery have not been evaluated for adenocarcinoma in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). We investigated the long-term outcomes of ESD compared with surgery for adenocarcinoma in the EGJ. Methods: Subjects who underwent ESD or surgery for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma which met absolute and expanded criteria between 2005 and 2010 were eligible for this study. Clinical features and treatment outcomes were retrospectively reviewed using medical records. Results: Among 79 patients included, 40 underwent ESD and 39 underwent surgery. During the median follow-up period of 60.9 months (range: 13.1-125.4 months), the 5-year overall survival rates were 93.9% and 97.3% for ESD and surgery groups, respectively ( p= 0.376). There was no gastric cancer-related deaths in either groups. Adverse events occurred in 11 patients (13.9%) overall and the incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar between two groups (10.0% vs. 17.9%, p= 0.308). Conclusions: ESD may be an effective alternative to surgery for the treatment of early gastric cancer in the EGJ, based on comparable long-term outcomes.

Outcomes of ESD for patients with early gastric cancer and comorbid liver cirrhosis: a propensity score analysis.

Gastric cancer and liver cirrhosis (LC) are often comorbid. However, little is known about the clinical outcomes of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with comorbid LC. This case-control study used a multicentre retrospective cohort. We identified 69 LC patients from the cohort of patients with early gastric cancer, who underwent gastric ESD at 12 hospitals from March 2003 to November 2010. Using the propensity score matching method, 69 patients without LC were used to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of ESD. Among the 69 LC patients, 53 (77 %) were Child-Pugh grade A (CP-A) and 16 (28 %) had past or present histories of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Short-term outcomes did not differ between the LC patients and controls or between the CP-A and CP-B/C patients. Although the LC patients had significantly worse long-term outcomes than the controls (the 5-year overall survival rates were 60 vs. 91 %, respectively), patients with CP-A liver function without HCC histories had an overall survival almost equivalent to that of patients without LC (controls). LC patients appear to be good candidates for ESD if they have CP-A liver function and no history of HCC. Although their short-term outcomes were not inferior, the patients with Child-Pugh grades B/C or with histories of HCC benefited less from ESD.

Early and long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in a large patient series

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables the curative resection of early gastric cancer (EGC); however, little information is available on the long-term outcomes of ESD. This study was conducted to clarify the clinical outcomes of a large number of patients with EGC who underwent ESD. The early outcomes were assessed in 1,209 patients and the long-term outcomes were assessed in 300 patients at a follow-up >5 years after the ESD procedure. The overall survival rates were compared between indication and expanded-indication groups, and between the patients who did or did not undergo additional surgery in an out-of-indication group. Overall survival rates were also compared among different age groups. In total, 617 lesions were classed as the indication group, 507 as the expanded-indication group and 208 as the out-of-indication group. Curative resection rates were 96.6% and 91.5% in the indication and expanded-indication groups, respectively. In terms of the long-term outcomes, 20 of the 146 patients in the indication group, 15 of the 105 patients in the expanded-indication group and one of the 23 patients who underwent additional surgery in the out-of-indication group succumbed due to causes other than gastric cancer. Among the 26 patients who did not undergo additional surgery in the out-of-indication group, 10 mortalities occurred, including one due to gastric cancer. The five-year survival rates were not significantly different between the indication and expanded-indication groups. In the out-of-indication group, the five-year survival rate for the patients who did not undergo additional surgery (65.0%) was significantly lower than that for those who did undergo additional surgery (100%) (P<0.01). The five-year survival rate of patients aged >80 years (67.1%) was significantly lower than that of the younger patients (<60 years, 91.6%; sixties, 93.0%; seventies, 84.5%) (P<0.0001). In conclusion, although expanded-indication of ESD for EGC is appropriate, comorbidities require consideration in elderly patients.

Comparison on the Long Term Outcome between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgical Treatment for Undifferentiated Early Gastric Cancer

There are controversies on the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for un-differentiated early gastric cancer (EGC) despite the expansion of ESD indications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long term outcome of ESD compared to that of surgical treatment in patients with undifferentiated EGC. A total of 76 patients who underwent ESD for undifferentiated EGC and 149 patients who met the ESD indication and received surgical treatment from January 2005 to December 2010 at Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital were included. In the ESD group, en bloc resection and complete resection were achieved in 84.2% (64/76) and 76.3% (58/76) of patients, respectively. Among these patients, 58 (76.3%) met the ESD indication (indication group), and the remaining 18 (23.7%) did not meet the ESD indication (above indication group). Complete resection rates for indication group and above indication group were 86.2% (50/58) and 44.4% (8/18), respectively (p<0.05). The mean follow-up period was 42.2 ± 19.2 months. Total recurrence rates in the ESD group and operation group were 14.1% (9/76) and 0.7% (1/149), respectively (p<0.05). The main complication of ESD was bleeding (5.2%, 4/76). In the operation group, 2 (1.3%) patients died from postoperative bleeding and leakage of anastomosis site. ESD may be a feasible and safe treatment modality compared to that of surgical treatment for undifferentiated EGC when managed according to the expanded criteria. However, close endoscopic surveillance is required in this group because of higher incidence of intragastric recurrence.

Sa1644 Outcomes and Long Term Prognosis of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer

Outcomes and Long Term Prognosis of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer Ken Ohnita*, Hajime Isomoto, Kayoko Matsushima, Yuko Akazawa, Naoyuki Yamaguchi, Hitoshi Nishiyama, Eiichiro Fukuda, Fuminao Takeshima, Saburo Shikuwa, Kazuhiko Nakao Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan; Internal Medicine, Sankokai Miyazaki Hospital, Isahaya, Japan Backgrounds: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) yields high rate of curative resection of early gastric cancer (EGC). However, little information is available on the long term outcomes of ESD in a large number of patients. Patients and method: A total of 1332 EGCs in 1209 consecutive patients were treated by ESD from January 2001 to December 2010. The indication criteria (group A) were defined as differentiated -type mucosal cancer without ulceration 2 cm in diameter. Expanded indication criteria (group B) were defined as follows; differentiated -type mucosal cancer without ulceration irrespective of tumor size, differentiated -type mucosal cancer with ulceration 3 cm in diameter, differentiated -type minute ( 500 m from the muscularis mucosae, sm1) submucosal invasive cancer 3 cm in size, and undifferentiated-type mucosal cancer without ulceration 2 cm in diameter with no lymphaticvascular involvement. Out of indication (group C) were defined as except for group A and B. The early outcomes (perforation and bleeding rate and curability) were assessed in 1209 patients. Resections were considered curative when a tumor was excised by en bloc and was within the indication or expanded indication criteria with tumor-free lateral and vertical margins and no lymphovascular invasion. Long-term outcomes were assessed in 319 patients for over 5-year follow-up. Overall survival rates among the three groups were compared. We compared the overall survival rates in different age groups. Results: Short-term outcomes were as follows; The 617 (46.3%) lesions were defined as group A , 507 (38.1%) lesions were defined as group B, and the 208 (15.6%) lesions were defined as group C. Curative resection rate were 96.6% (596/617) in group A and 91.5% (464/507) in group B. Total perforation rate was 2.9% (39/1332), which was higher in group B than in group A (4.3% [22/507] versus 1.8% [11/617], p 0.05). Total bleeding rate was 2.0% (26/1332), which was significantly higher in group C than in group A (4.8% [10/208] versus 1.1% [7/617], p 0.01) and in group B (4.8% [10/208] versus 1.8% [9/507], p 0.05). In analysis of long term outcomes, median term of observation was 66 months (1106 months). In the 53 patients out of group C, 26 patients had additional surgery. Of the 266 patients with group A or group B, 41 patients died of nongastric cancer disease. Of the 53 patients with group C, 11 patients died (one patient died of gastric cancer). The 5-year survival rates in three groups were not significantly different. However, the 5-year survival rates in the patients over 80 years old (59.2%) were lower than the younger age-group (under 60 years old; 88.4%, sixties; 93.5%, seventies; 82.7%) (p 0.01). Conclusions: Expanded indication of ESD for early gastric cancer is appropriate, but it is necessary to consider the basal disease in elder patients.

Multicenter study of the long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in patients 80 years of age or older

Little information is available on the long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) in patients of advanced age (≥80years). A multicenter study was conducted at 10 Japanese institutions concerning their results for ESD. Data on 440 patients of advanced age (≥80years) with EGC (470 lesions) were collected and reviewed. Early and long-term outcomes of ESD were assessed. We compared the overall survival rates between 3 patient groups, those with curative ESD, additional surgery after noncurative ESD, and nonsurgical follow-up after noncurative ESD. Bleeding and perforation rates were 3.2 and 2.8%, respectively. Curative ESD was achieved in 366 of the 470 lesions (77.9%). Of the 104 patients with noncurative ESD, 12 patients (11.5%) underwent additional surgery and 91 patients (87.5%) were followed without surgery. The 5-year survival rate in the patients with nonsurgical follow-up after noncurative ESD (66.7%) was significantly lower than that in the patients with curative ESD (80.3%, p=0.0001). There was no significant difference in the 5-year survival rates between the patients with curative ESD and those with surgery after noncurative ESD (100%, p=0.21), nor was there a difference in these rates between the patients with surgery after noncurative ESD and those with nonsurgical follow-up after noncurative ESD (p=0.061). None of the patients developed cancer recurrence after curative ESD, and none developed cancer recurrence following the additional surgery after noncurative ESD. In the patients with curative ESD and in those with surgery after noncurative ESD, the cumulative observed survival was better than the expected survival for the general population of similar age and gender. ESD is safe for the treatment of EGC in patients 80years of age or older. Both curative ESD and additional surgery after noncurative ESD may contribute to the extension of life expectancy.